The Libyan Conundrum Part V: The Enemy Has a Vote

Well, it looks like this administration is finally realizing that just proclaiming victory doesn’t make it so.  Before we went into Libya, I blogged that it would devolve into a mess without a heavy stability and support operation (SASO) on our part, and that the administration was rightfully hesitant to conduct a no-fly zone due to these realities.  The administration then ignored my prescient blog and went ahead with “leading from behind”, with President Obama proclaiming No Boots on the Ground in Libya.  We applied our air power, Ghaddafi fell, and we stuck to our guns.  No boots on the ground.  No helping to restore a functioning government.  No follow-through on the vacuum we’d created.  We just sat back and watched the country fall into chaos, ultimately resulting in the Benghazi debacle. 

This wishful operational framework dovetailed nicely with the administration’s national security team’s new strategic guidance, which could be summed up as, “We don’t like SASO, so we won’t do SASO”.  At the time I said this was ridiculous.  Like the administration saying, “We ended the war in Iraq”, just saying the words doesn’t make it so, and we’re apparently starting to understand that fact.

Recently, the Department of Defense stated they were preparing plans to train thousands of Libyan conventional and special operations troops over the span of years in an effort to stabilize the disaster that is Libya.  Does this mean the administration lied?  No.  We’re going to do the training in Bulgaria, flying the Libyans there on a rotational basis.

On the surface, I’m okay with the training because of the Pottery Barn rule: You break it, you buy it, but it aggravates me that we got ourselves in this mess to begin with.  Since we were so short-sighted on the repercussions of felling Ghaddafi – this after watching Iraq fall apart – we now have to attempt to prevent the spread of chaos in north Africa (See MALI) by training security forces in Bulgaria.  Why can’t we do it in Libya, you ask?  Because the place is such a mess it isn’t safe.  We gave that a try, and a militia force came in and stole all of our weapons, NODS and vehicles.  Seriously.  It would require more security forces than trainers due to the chaos.

What really chaps my ass is the fact that the department of defense is being eviscerated by budget cuts, with all services hysterical about the drop in readiness due to a lack of money for training – leaving the Army with only two brigades combat ready – and yet we now have to use that limited budget to train up someone else’s army because we naively believed we could pound our chest and win a “bloodless” war.

The capstone quote of the Libyan debacle comes from Admiral McRaven, the head of SOCOM.  Speaking on Saturday at a national defense forum, he openly stated that there’s some risk of Islamic extremists slipping into the mix and getting trained.  Huh.  Seems like someone was warning about that before we initiated hostilities in Libya in the first place.  Oh yeah, IT WAS ME.  How can the entire national security team know less than one retired lieutenant colonel?  It sickens me.

I hope all of the people demanding the fall of President Assad in Syria in one breath, but proclaiming “No boots on the ground” with their second breath, are taking notice (yes, I’m talking to you John McCain and Lindsey Graham).  Just because you wish it so doesn’t make it so, and the enemy has a vote.

By | 2013-11-19T11:24:52+00:00 November 19th, 2013|Blog|2 Comments

About the Author:


  1. joe mack December 4, 2013 at 11:20 pm - Reply

    I’ve read all of your books so far , I really enjoy them, your in good company like Brad Thor, THE late and Great Vince Flynn. Patrick Robinson .I keep current on All current affairs, especially with this Jerk in the white house . the worst president in this Nations history

  2. Matthew Barber December 11, 2013 at 9:17 pm - Reply

    Mr. Taylor,

    A common theme in your works, and one that I tend to agree with, is that we have smart, capable and responsible people at the helm of our defense networks. Whether it be the intelligence community, operators or simply civilian assets who fill all of the niche jobs we need done, these people need both our trust and our support. In an age of information overload and an almost insane clamor for transparency, how should our government’s defense apparatus earn our trust back? Is there a magical series of events that would stop our people from decrying every perceived slight on their civil liberties and be thankful for the safety and protection that they take for granted? Moderation is always the goal, but it just seems like the government is out of cards to play and the trust meter is still going down while their are still, and will always be, threats our there. How do we reaffirm our faith in our protectors? Or maybe this is just something we have to grow out of over time? Thanks for your time, in any event.

    ~Matthew Barber

Leave A Comment