Another tragic shooting, and the same tired arguments. Why is that?

After the Las Vegas Massacre, I wrote a blog for FoxNews.com. After the tragic events in Florida, I thought it was appropriate to post it again here, on my website.  Not to start a debate, but to show where the debate now stands and why nothing gets done.  There are sensible gun safety regulations I would support, but honestly, because of the partisan world we live in, I have no faith in the opposition to offer anything that would prevent the tragedy that occurred, instead using the tragedy to attack law-abiding gun owners.  From October 7th, 2017:

Gun control is the hot topic of the day, and as usual it’s devolved into entrenched positions where many people supporting the Second Amendment will not give an inch, no matter the proposal. Why is that?

Do people who own firearms really believe that everyone should have the right to legally modify an AR platform so that it nearly duplicates the cyclic rate of a military assault weapon?

I had this conversation recently with a friend of mine, a former special operations soldier, who now makes a living providing firearms instruction to police SWAT units. As for me, I own two AR platforms, several pistols, shotguns and other rifles. I’m also a former special operations soldier, a member of the National Rifle Association, and support and defend the Second Amendment. We both agreed that bump stocks should be illegal.

Previously, bump stocks were simply toys that allowed recreational shooters to pretend they were firing an automatic weapon on the range. Because of the bump stock’s firing system, it isn’t inherently accurate, and the wasting of ammo using it relegated it to a gimmick. That was before the massacre in Las Vegas.

Bump stocks are no longer a gimmick. Accuracy became irrelevant when the target set was a crowd of 22,000 concert-goers in an open field in Las Vegas, where 58 people were shot dead and nearly 500 were hospitalized when a gunman opened fire last Sunday in the worst mass shooting in modern U.S. history.

Fully automatic weapons are currently prohibited without an enormous expenditure of time, effort and money. Any mechanical device that is designed to enhance the cyclic rate of fire of a semiautomatic weapon to duplicate that capability should be illegal – and should include devices separate from the bump stock, such as hand cranks.

I imagine the majority of gun owners would feel the same way, although I’m sure I’ll get hate mail from some.

After some vacillating from members of Congress about studies and research, the NRA finally issued a statement Thursday that called on the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives “to immediately review whether these devices (bump stocks) comply with federal laws.” The statement added: “The NRA believes that devices designed to allow semi-automatic rifles to function like fully-automatic rifles should be subject to additional regulations.”

Why did the NRA and staunch Second Amendment defenders in Congress not immediately call for making bump stocks illegal after the deadly rampage in Las Vegas Sunday? Why the equivocating when the issue is pretty clear-cut?

The answer is that gun owners see the fight in zero-sum terms, believing that the other side doesn’t care about preventing another Las Vegas, but instead wants to attack firearms ownership however it can. There is no faith in the intentions of gun control advocates, and for good reason.

The blood hadn’t even dried in the streets of Las Vegas before the de facto leader of the left, Hillary Clinton, tweeted about a suppressor bill currently in Congress. Immediately, the Twittersphere took up the charge, proclaiming that if the killer had used a “silencer,” the death toll would have been exponentially worse.

This is absolute hogwash, as everyone who has a modicum of knowledge about guns knows. To us, it’s a window into the true agenda. Hollywood would have you believe that a suppressor renders the bullet whisper quiet. That is simply untrue.

The shooter was four football fields away from his victims, and the sound everyone hears on the videos is not the explosion of the gunpowder, it’s the noise of the bullets breaking the sound barrier, something the suppressor does nothing to muffle.

In fact, the average suppressor simply lowers the gunfire to hearing-safe levels, but it’s certainly still loud (full disclosure: one of my AR rifles is suppressed). The fact is that suppressors would not have increased the death toll in Las Vegas, and Clinton knows it or should know it – even if her minions do not.

And yet Clinton used the tragedy of Las Vegas to further her agenda of attacking anything pertaining to firearms instead of working toward a solution to prevent a future mass casualty event. Gun owners see this, and instead of encouraging dialogue across the divide, it simply stiffens their will to resist.

Make no mistake, among ourselves gun owners are the first to decry the heinous use of a firearm. But when faced with the clearly partisan and cynical use of every event to further an overarching agenda, we close ranks reflexively – even over something as simple as the bump stock.

Gun owners are not evil. But we do fear the hidden machinations of the people espousing “common sense solutions” – especially when the proposal in question is anything but. If we as a nation truly want to work together to prevent tragedies like Las Vegas, the first requirement is trust in the good faith of the other side, and as Clinton just illustrated, that trust isn’t there.

By |2018-02-16T19:42:06+00:00February 16th, 2018|Blog, Uncategorized|3 Comments

About the Author:

3 Comments

  1. Roy Selvidge February 18, 2018 at 5:33 pm - Reply

    Brad- Great post as usual, agree on most. If you kill someone with a car, no one blames the car. If you use a hammer or chainsaw (only in TX :)) no one blames the tool. If you kill someone with a gun, it’s obviously the guns fault, if we listen to the talking heads. Of course that’s hogwash, to put it politely. An individual made the decision to break the law and commit a crime that rises to the level of the most heinous. Not a tool. Let’s address the person, and not the tool chosen to kill with. I don’t have a glib or easy answer for this, and there isn’t one out there, but using that as an excuse to abrogate our rights is wrong. It is something done by those who have a control issue, and not just the gun control kind. They don’t understand different ways of doing things, and take the my way or the highway approach to politics.

    I don’t agree with your position on bump stocks for this reason. It might not be your or my thing, having expended a large number of rounds on full auto courtesy of the Government, but for a lot of people it is a fun way to convert money into noise. It isn’t any more precise than most full auto fire, simulated or otherwise, but only look at Knob Creek, KY to see how popular that is. I’ll confess, rocking the Ma Deuce was a lot of fun and as long as you don’t murder your fellow man (there should be a law against that!) have at it. Great commentary otherwise, that was my only nit to pick.

    PS- on an earlier blog post you mentioned 10 round mags as a reasonable limit as proper shot placement/training should deal with this. I disagree with this for three reasons.
    One, there have been several instances of people shooting dry, and some of them trained police officers with Glock 17’s. I’m sure they have more training than either of our wives, but I wouldn’t want to restrict my wife in an emergency.
    Two, if you train a bit, mag changes aren’t that hard- push/pull, slap the belt/slide release and back on target. Not simple, but trainable.
    Three, the New York Reload is always an optional has been used by various bad sorts as a way to skip past number two, to include school shooters.

    People have done bad things to others for centuries, and evil truly exists. They’ve done far worse without guns (fire, explosives, trucks, etc.) and will in the future. We need to be ready to deal with it when it happens, and not pretend the tool is the problem. Keep up the good work.
    Best, Roy

    • Brad Taylor February 18, 2018 at 10:26 pm - Reply

      Thank you for the comment, but I’ll say that just because someone WANTS to use a bump stock to spray cans on a range doesn’t mean that it’s a God Given right. You mention Knob Creek, but everyone shooting there is shooting a weapon that has been back-checked. There are no Vegas shooters there. I’m a firm believer in the second amendment, but when a tool is used to slaughter, and that tool serves no useful purpose beyond someone wanting to “feel” like they’re firing full auto, I have no problem with removing it. We now live in a world with absolutes – IE “if you say remove the bump stock, what is the next thing?” But we also live in a world of death, IE – Las Vegas happened. As gun owners, we need to take a hard look at what we truly believe is sacrosanct, and defend that. Bump stocks? Not something I’m willing to defend. Especially after Las Vegas. Having the ability to get your joy off pretending to fire full auto is not worth the death. Yeah, I know I’ll be called an apostate, but it’s the truth. As for the ten round limit, that was specifically toward the mass shooting scenario. Yes, training could have overcome that, but let’s face some facts. The kids doing this don’t have any training. Having said that, With the plethora of magazines out in the world, that ship has probably already sailed. I got beat up pretty hard about it, but since I wrote it, I let it stand. Finally, you say that evil exists – but that evil is only allowed to use what we let them. You say they’ve done far worse with explosive, but they had to build those in the basement of a house, and have literally killed themselves as much as they’ve killed others – or the bomb was a dud. What if they didn’t have to build the bomb? What if they could just buy it at the hardware store? There is a reason that terrorists are using trucks – and it’s because other greater methods of death are not available. This is not a good argument for defending the right to bear arms.

  2. William Vose March 1, 2018 at 12:25 am - Reply

    Beware letting that camel get his nose into the tent !
    Good comments but their goal is total disarmament of all civilians ,therefore only the government and criminals will be armed and the best trained of us will become criminals !
    RLTW

Leave A Comment